Skip to main content

About your Search

20130113
20130121
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
and stimulating through the tax code and i mean, there's an absurd notion if you tax people making $400,000 a year and. >> neil: you're not following the script. you opened with a relatively easing savings. >> and save stuff by-- >> and what do you think about this. >> if it were that easy it would have been done already and these congress people are not as stupid as you think, although mr. nixon did once say that most congressmen are not fit to be dog catchers, but-- dog catchers pretty sad job. >> it's not as easy as you think or else it would have been done and also the-- >> i disagree, ben, because it is easy, but, obvisly, each party clings to its more dog mattic starts and making it impossible to be rational. >> it's simple, but not easy. the tragic part of this is even with the savings, the deficit and accumulative federal debt-- instead of an act of heroism such as never has been seen on capitol hill before. >> neil: that part you're right. adam. >> i would state this differently. the cbo is playing math games, that's fine. cut 1%, this is what you get. what they're not playing is politica
the news, and a private efficacy group in support of the health care laws is now hosting a tax section with journalists on the best way to cover the president's health care law, offering what they're calling specialized education in health care reporting. charlie gasperino. >> i can't wait to sign up, dude. (laughter) >> isn't that weird and that anyone would sign up for, i'm sorry we got it wrong. >> any, any journalists that signs up for this should be thrown out of the industry immediately and taking-- i'm trying to take it seriously. it's so stupid it's unbelievable. i'm going to pass this to adam. >> adam, what-- (laughter) >> i'm going to try to explain. part of this they think there's bad report ong this because the reporters don't know what's in the law and they want to give them the straight skinny right from the folks who wrote it. what do you make of that? >> normally, on journalistic issues charlie and i are in lockstep. i disagree with you, if you're a reporter covering the intricacies of this extremely complicated legislation and regulation, you have nothing to lose by
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)